Personal vs. Enterprise Goodwill in a Professional Practice Valuation: What Attorneys Should Ask
In a medical or dental practice, most of the value is goodwill, and most of the dispute is over whose goodwill it is.
Two kinds of goodwill
Personal goodwill attaches to the individual doctor: reputation, referral relationships, patient loyalty to that provider, clinical skill. If the doctor leaves, it leaves too.
Enterprise goodwill attaches to the practice and would pass to a buyer: the location, trained staff, scheduling and recall systems, payor and group contracts, patient records, and the hygiene or support departments that keep patients returning regardless of who holds the license.
Courts in different states treat the two differently when dividing property, and the rule is not settled everywhere. Confirm with counsel which rule your court applies. The analyst's job is to give the court numbers it can use under any rule.
The insight: ask for a report that works under either rule
A report that gives one goodwill figure forces a decision before the court has decided the legal question. If the ruling goes the other way at trial or on appeal, there is no number to apply. The stronger report states total goodwill, then allocates it between personal and enterprise, and shows the evidence for the split.
How an analyst separates the two
None of these is a formula. Each is evidence, and a credible allocation uses all three.
Transferability review. What would a buyer actually acquire, and what would walk out the door? Look at how many providers produce revenue, how patients are assigned, who holds the referral relationships, and whether payor contracts belong to the practice or to the individual provider.
With-and-without comparison. What happens to revenue when the owner is not in the chair? A practice with associates who produce a meaningful share of collections, and a history of patients staying through provider changes, has more enterprise value than a solo practice where one doctor produces nearly everything.
Market evidence. How do practice sales in this specialty actually close? Transition periods, earn-outs, and covenants not to compete show how buyers price what they can and cannot keep.
Where reports go wrong
An unsupported percentage. A report that says goodwill is "70% personal" without showing how it got there is an opinion without a foundation.
Counting owner dependence three times. Normalizing the owner's compensation, applying a key person discount, and carving out personal goodwill all address the same risk. Using all three on the same dollars understates value.
Excluding the income from property, then counting it again for support. If personal goodwill is treated as the owner's future earning ability and kept out of the marital estate, ask whether the same earnings also drive an alimony or child support number. Jurisdictions differ on how to handle this, and a good report flags it.
Questions to ask your expert
Does the report give total goodwill and a personal and enterprise allocation, or only one figure?
What evidence supports the allocation?
What share of revenue is produced by providers other than the owner?
How did the analyst avoid counting owner dependence more than once?
Is there a covenant not to compete or similar restriction, and how was it treated?
Comments